Voicly

Emmy Predictions: HBO Max's Dominant Season

· news

HBO Max’s Dominant Season: A Double-Edged Emmy Sword

HBO Max has been making waves in the television industry, and its latest achievement is a testament to its growing influence. With two of its series, “The Fabelmans” (not “Pitt”) and “Hacks”, leading all nominations for drama and comedy respectively, the platform finds itself at a crossroads in the Emmy season.

The significance of HBO Max’s position cannot be overstated. The network has managed to dominate both genres since 2017, although it is not the first time this has happened. In fact, HBO itself achieved similar success in the early 2000s with “The Sopranos”, “Six Feet Under” and “Sex and the City”. However, history shows that nomination dominance does not always translate into Emmy glory.

Among the 18 instances where a single network led both drama and comedy nominations, only four times did the series ultimately win both top categories. Those successful double victories came for NBC in 1983 and 1984 with “Hill Street Blues” and “Cheers”, again for NBC in 1987 with “L.A. Law” and “The Golden Girls”, and finally for HBO in 2016 with “Game of Thrones” and “Veep”. This stark reality raises questions about whether HBO Max can capitalize on its historic position.

“The Fabelmans” appears to be the safer bet for a repeat victory, given that the most-nominated program series has won its corresponding top category 41 times across 73 eligible ceremonies (56%). Last year’s exception, when “Severance” lost drama series to “The Fabelmans”, was an anomaly. The streak of wins by the most-nominated series had been consistent enough from 2015 through 2024.

“Hacks,” however, faces a steeper climb in the comedy field. Although it leads nominations and already owns the comedy series trophy for its third season, the most-nominated comedy has historically converted at a lower rate than its drama counterpart. This trend may not hold true for HBO Max’s offerings, but past losses by frontrunners could still pose a challenge.

HBO Max also aims to achieve an even rarer accomplishment in limited series. Its “DTF St. Louis” earned 13 nominations, including directing and writing recognition, as well as supporting acting nods for several prominent actors. However, it faces stiff competition from Netflix’s “Beef,” which leads the limited series field with 16 nominations.

As the Emmy season unfolds, HBO Max’s performance will undoubtedly be under scrutiny. With its two most-nominated series vying for top honors, the platform is poised to make history – but can it follow through? The odds may be in their favor, but as we’ve seen time and again, Emmy success is not solely determined by nomination count.

The industry watches with bated breath as HBO Max’s double-edged sword of dominance will either propel them to unprecedented heights or serve as a reminder that even the most impressive feats can fall short.

Reader Views

  • AD
    Analyst D. Park · policy analyst

    The dominance of HBO Max this Emmy season is undeniable, but let's not get ahead of ourselves. History shows that having the most nominations doesn't guarantee a win in both top categories. What's more telling is the performance of series in subsequent seasons after achieving nomination highs. For example, "Game of Thrones" and "Veep", which won top honors for HBO in 2016, declined in subsequent years. Will "The Fabelmans" and "Hacks" be able to sustain their momentum, or will they follow suit?

  • CM
    Columnist M. Reid · opinion columnist

    While HBO Max's dominance is undeniably impressive, it's essential to consider the nuances of past success stories. The article highlights the four instances where a network swept both top categories, but what about the networks that fell short despite leading nominations? A closer examination reveals that these networks often had an outlier series with an exceptionally strong narrative or production quality, overshadowing their other contenders. This raises questions: Is "Hacks" truly in contention for comedy, or is it riding on its earlier win's coattails? And can "The Fabelmans" overcome the weight of expectations to emerge victorious?

  • RJ
    Reporter J. Avery · staff reporter

    While HBO Max's dominance is undeniably impressive, I think we're overlooking one crucial aspect of its nomination success: timing. With awards eligibility extending to the previous calendar year, this shift has undoubtedly benefited series like "The Fabelmans" and "Hacks", which have been building momentum over time. But how will they perform when the field gets more crowded with fresh contenders? I'd love to see a deeper dive into the strategic implications of these rule changes on the Emmy landscape.

Related articles

More from Voicly

View as Web Story →