Voicly

Laser Blinds Pilot in Kolkata

· news

Laser-Blinded: The Soaring Threats to Air Travel

A Malaysia Airlines flight from Kuala Lumpur was forced to circle above Kolkata after its pilot was momentarily blinded by a laser beam. This incident on Flight MH-184 is part of a disturbing trend of increasing threats to air travel security.

The use of lasers around airports has long been prohibited, but the frequency and severity of incidents are rising. In 2020, a British Airways pilot had to divert a flight from Los Angeles due to a laser strike, while Indian airport authorities have repeatedly issued warnings about the dangers of laser beams aimed at aircraft.

The “fly-by-wire” control systems used by modern jets are incredibly sophisticated, but they can also be easily compromised by a well-placed laser beam. This vulnerability is exacerbated by the growing complexity of air travel technology, which makes it increasingly susceptible to external disruptions.

As air traffic continues to grow, so does the risk of catastrophic incidents due to human error or technological vulnerabilities. The 2009 crash of a Polish Air Force plane carrying Poland’s president near Smolensk highlighted the fragility of modern air travel, even when attributed to human factors rather than technical malfunctions.

The incident at Kolkata airport also raises questions about airport security protocols. Vikram Singh, the Kolkata airport director, acknowledged that while laser strikes are occasional, they can have serious consequences for aircraft operations. The fact that the airline and authorities did not immediately alert the public is concerning, given the potential for panic and disruption in such situations.

To address this growing threat, governments, airlines, and airports must take a more proactive stance against laser-related threats. This includes stepped-up enforcement of existing regulations and investment in advanced technologies to detect and neutralize such threats. It also requires greater transparency and communication with passengers and crew about potential risks.

In the absence of effective measures, air travel remains at risk from external disruptions, where technology’s benefits are constantly at risk of being undone by human error or laser attacks.

Reader Views

  • CM
    Columnist M. Reid · opinion columnist

    The Kolkata incident is a stark reminder that air travel's vulnerability to laser attacks far exceeds the realm of isolated incidents. One aspect missing from this discussion is the role of passenger culpability. While we rightly condemn perpetrators who intentionally aim lasers at aircraft, what about those who inadvertently leave their high-powered pointers unsecured or in accessible locations? Airports and airlines must also focus on educating passengers about responsible gadget use and preventing human error that can be just as deadly as deliberate attacks.

  • CS
    Correspondent S. Tan · field correspondent

    The increasing reliance on "fly-by-wire" systems in modern jets is both a marvel of engineering and a ticking time bomb waiting to be exploited by malicious actors. The laser strike incident at Kolkata airport highlights the need for more robust security protocols, but we must also consider the human factor: what drives individuals to intentionally disrupt air travel? While authorities focus on technical vulnerabilities, it's equally important to address the root causes of this behavior and develop strategies to prevent such incidents before they take place.

  • AD
    Analyst D. Park · policy analyst

    The laser-blinded pilot incident at Kolkata's airport is a stark reminder of the fragility of modern air travel. While regulatory agencies have been aware of this threat for years, there needs to be greater emphasis on securing perimeters and identifying individuals responsible for these attacks. Moreover, airports must implement more effective communication protocols with airlines and passengers in case of such incidents, rather than remaining silent and potentially spreading panic through inaction.

Related articles

More from Voicly

View as Web Story →